Compare
Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) vs Kimberly-Clark (CENTA vs KMB)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) (CENTA) returned +43.6% and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) +8.4%; so far this year the figures are +39.8% and +7.5%.
Kimberly-Clark is the larger company by market value, about 14.3 times the size of Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A).
On trailing earnings, CENTA trades at 15.1 times and KMB at 10.9 times.
Revenue grew -1.2% at CENTA and +0.6% at KMB over the last year.
CENTA pays no dividend. KMB yields 4.70%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| CENTA | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $40.80 | $108.43 |
| 1-day | -0.68% | -1.84% |
| YTD | +39.77% | +7.47% |
| 1 year | +43.61% | +8.38% |
| 3 years | +29.34% | -9.24% |
| Market cap | $2.5B | $36.1B |
| P/E | 15.1 | 10.9 |
| P/S | 0.82 | 2.18 |
| P/B | 1.45 | 12.30 |
| Revenue growth | -1.20% | +0.60% |
| EPS growth | +22.70% | +67.70% |
| Gross margin % | 32.5 | 36.5 |
| Net margin % | 5.4 | 19.9 |
| ROE % | 9.5 | 112.6 |
| Debt / equity | 0.68 | 2.21 |
| FCF yield % | 13.7 | 5.4 |
| Dividend yield % | — | 4.70 |
| Beta | 0.26 | 0.05 |
| RSI (14) | 69.6 | 55.8 |
| Technical rating |