Compare
Frost Bank vs M&T Bank (CFR vs MTB)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year Frost Bank (CFR) returned +25.1% and M&T Bank (MTB) +18.8%; so far this year the figures are +22.6% and +8.1%.
M&T Bank is the larger company by market value, about 3.2 times the size of Frost Bank.
On trailing earnings, CFR trades at 14.4 times and MTB at 11.4 times.
Revenue grew +15.3% at CFR and +5.5% at MTB over the last year.
CFR yields 2.62%. MTB yields 2.76%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| CFR | MTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $155.23 | $217.75 |
| 1-day | -0.93% | -0.92% |
| YTD | +22.59% | +8.08% |
| 1 year | +25.10% | +18.76% |
| 3 years | +72.78% | +94.19% |
| Market cap | $9.7B | $31.2B |
| P/E | 14.4 | 11.4 |
| P/S | 71.50 | 18.18 |
| P/B | 2.43 | 1.11 |
| Revenue growth | +15.30% | +5.50% |
| EPS growth | +10.60% | +17.90% |
| Gross margin % | — | — |
| Net margin % | 510.8 | 175.6 |
| ROE % | 17.3 | 10.7 |
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| FCF yield % | 6.0 | 13.0 |
| Dividend yield % | 2.62 | 2.76 |
| Beta | 0.28 | 0.57 |
| RSI (14) | 45.7 | 43.6 |
| Technical rating |