Compare
Churchill Downs vs Las Vegas Sands (CHDN vs LVS)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year Churchill Downs (CHDN) returned -1.1% and Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -34.9%; so far this year the figures are -13.9% and -37.4%.
Las Vegas Sands is the larger company by market value, about 3.8 times the size of Churchill Downs.
On trailing earnings, CHDN trades at 17.8 times and LVS at 16.7 times.
Revenue grew +4.2% at CHDN and +10.9% at LVS over the last year.
CHDN yields 0.45%. LVS yields 2.95%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| CHDN | LVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $97.94 | $40.73 |
| 1-day | -0.24% | -0.46% |
| YTD | -13.92% | -37.43% |
| 1 year | -1.07% | -34.87% |
| 3 years | -10.07% | -12.84% |
| Market cap | $6.7B | $25.5B |
| P/E | 17.8 | 16.7 |
| P/S | 2.23 | 1.88 |
| P/B | 4.87 | — |
| Revenue growth | +4.20% | +10.90% |
| EPS growth | — | +10.40% |
| Gross margin % | — | — |
| Net margin % | 15.1 | 11.8 |
| ROE % | 33.0 | — |
| Debt / equity | 3.42 | — |
| FCF yield % | 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Dividend yield % | 0.45 | 2.95 |
| Beta | 0.35 | 0.51 |
| RSI (14) | 73.1 | 65.2 |
| Technical rating |