Compare
ConocoPhillips vs Patterson-UTI Energy (COP vs PTEN)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year ConocoPhillips (COP) returned +55.4% and Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) +63.4%; so far this year the figures are +45.6% and +62.4%.
ConocoPhillips is the larger company by market value, about 42.9 times the size of Patterson-UTI Energy.
Revenue grew +13.1% at COP and +0.4% at PTEN over the last year.
COP yields 2.47%. PTEN yields 3.83%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| COP | PTEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $136.27 | $9.92 |
| 1-day | +0.60% | -0.30% |
| YTD | +45.57% | +62.36% |
| 1 year | +55.38% | +63.43% |
| 3 years | +16.80% | -21.02% |
| Market cap | $161.1B | $3.8B |
| P/E | 14.3 | — |
| P/S | 2.68 | 0.78 |
| P/B | 2.44 | 1.23 |
| Revenue growth | +13.10% | +0.40% |
| EPS growth | +34.70% | — |
| Gross margin % | 57.4 | — |
| Net margin % | 19.2 | -0.5 |
| ROE % | 17.5 | -0.8 |
| Debt / equity | 0.35 | 0.40 |
| FCF yield % | 14.4 | 7.1 |
| Dividend yield % | 2.47 | 3.83 |
| Beta | -0.63 | -0.27 |
| RSI (14) | 42.6 | 34.2 |
| Technical rating |