Compare
H.B. Fuller vs Sherwin-Williams (FUL vs SHW)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year H.B. Fuller (FUL) returned -13.7% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) +2.5%; so far this year the figures are -16.1% and +6.2%.
Sherwin-Williams is the larger company by market value, about 31.0 times the size of H.B. Fuller.
On trailing earnings, FUL trades at 13.9 times and SHW at 31.6 times.
Revenue grew +1.5% at FUL and +7.0% at SHW over the last year.
FUL yields 1.95%. SHW yields 0.93%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| FUL | SHW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $49.86 | $344.10 |
| 1-day | -0.72% | -1.41% |
| YTD | -16.15% | +6.19% |
| 1 year | -13.66% | +2.48% |
| 3 years | -24.37% | +44.03% |
| Market cap | $2.7B | $83.1B |
| P/E | 13.9 | 31.6 |
| P/S | 0.76 | 3.34 |
| P/B | 1.24 | 20.90 |
| Revenue growth | +1.50% | +7.00% |
| EPS growth | +71.80% | +6.10% |
| Gross margin % | 32.3 | 48.6 |
| Net margin % | 5.6 | 10.7 |
| ROE % | 9.1 | 67.3 |
| Debt / equity | 0.95 | 2.37 |
| FCF yield % | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Dividend yield % | 1.95 | 0.93 |
| Beta | 0.91 | 0.84 |
| RSI (14) | 46.4 | 54.1 |
| Technical rating |