Compare
Kimberly-Clark vs WD-40 (KMB vs WDFC)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year Kimberly-Clark (KMB) returned +8.4% and WD-40 (WDFC) +11.9%; so far this year the figures are +7.5% and +12.5%.
Kimberly-Clark is the larger company by market value, about 12.1 times the size of WD-40.
On trailing earnings, KMB trades at 10.9 times and WDFC at 36.4 times.
Revenue grew +0.6% at KMB and +11.0% at WDFC over the last year.
KMB yields 4.70%. WDFC yields 1.84%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| KMB | WDFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $108.43 | $221.58 |
| 1-day | -1.84% | -2.53% |
| YTD | +7.47% | +12.53% |
| 1 year | +8.38% | +11.90% |
| 3 years | -9.24% | +4.37% |
| Market cap | $36.1B | $3.0B |
| P/E | 10.9 | 36.4 |
| P/S | 2.18 | 4.31 |
| P/B | 12.30 | 10.87 |
| Revenue growth | +0.60% | +11.00% |
| EPS growth | +67.70% | -9.00% |
| Gross margin % | 36.5 | 55.3 |
| Net margin % | 19.9 | 12.0 |
| ROE % | 112.6 | 30.2 |
| Debt / equity | 2.21 | 0.32 |
| FCF yield % | 5.4 | 3.3 |
| Dividend yield % | 4.70 | 1.84 |
| Beta | 0.05 | 0.19 |
| RSI (14) | 55.8 | 56.8 |
| Technical rating |