Compare
Schlumberger vs Cactus (SLB vs WHD)
The two stocks side by side, as of the latest close. Performance is rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Over the past year Schlumberger (SLB) returned +36.6% and Cactus (WHD) +35.1%; so far this year the figures are +30.1% and +27.2%.
On trailing earnings, SLB trades at 24.2 times and WHD at 30.9 times.
Revenue grew +4.6% at SLB and +40.4% at WHD over the last year.
SLB yields 2.34%. WHD yields 0.98%.
Data as of the latest close. Not investment advice.
Relative performance
| SLB | WHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $49.92 | $58.12 |
| 1-day | +0.56% | +5.65% |
| YTD | +30.07% | +27.23% |
| 1 year | +36.58% | +35.10% |
| 3 years | -10.63% | +26.29% |
| Market cap | $73.7B | — |
| P/E | 24.2 | 30.9 |
| P/S | 2.00 | — |
| P/B | 2.83 | — |
| Revenue growth | +4.60% | +40.40% |
| EPS growth | -20.50% | — |
| Gross margin % | 59.9 | 33.5 |
| Net margin % | 8.4 | 12.0 |
| ROE % | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Debt / equity | 0.50 | 0.02 |
| FCF yield % | 6.2 | — |
| Dividend yield % | 2.34 | 0.98 |
| Beta | 0.71 | 1.00 |
| RSI (14) | 42.9 | 39.7 |
| Technical rating |